git workflow: Can I prevent a certain file from being merged to another branch but still keep it under version control?


I have a repository with two branches: live and stage. The repository holds code for a web based application. I would like to maintain two different .htaccess files for the stage and live branches, but still keep them version controlled, since the nature of serving a stage site is a little bit different (right now for instance, I want the caches to be timed differently).

I’m a novice with git so there is probably an easy explanation, but I’d like to have a workflow where when I was in live and I pulled changes (simple git merge stage), I didn’t overwrite the existing .htaccess in the live branch. Is there any way to configure this? Am I missing some big concept in git?

Likewise, there is also a chunk of a (but possibly many) .html files where I would like to keep track of changes but not merge them back into live. Just to be clear I want live and stage to got keep track of changes in these files, but know not to merge those certain changes when doing merges.


I found an answer on another question on Stack Overflow, credit goes to fcurella:

Let’s say you want to exclude the file config.php

On branch A:

  1. Create a file named .gitattributes in the same dir, with this line: config.php merge=ours. This tells git what strategy to use when merging the file. In this case it always keep your version, ie. the version on the branch you are merging into.

  2. Add the .gitattributes file and commit

On branch B: repeat steps 1-2

Try merging now. Your file should be left untouched.

This seems like a more scalable solution.

Answered By – Ankur

This Answer collected from stackoverflow, is licensed under cc by-sa 2.5 , cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0

Leave a Reply

(*) Required, Your email will not be published