Issue
ModelCheckPoint
gives options to save both for val_Acc
and val_loss
separately.
I want to modify this in a way so that if val_acc
is improving -> save model. if val_acc
is equal to previous best val_acc
then check for val_loss
, if val_loss
is less than previous best val_loss
then save the model.
if val_acc(epoch i)> best_val_acc:
save model
else if val_acc(epoch i) == best_val_acc:
if val_loss(epoch i) < best_val_loss:
save model
else
do not save model
Solution
You can just add two callbacks:
callbacks = [ModelCheckpoint(filepathAcc, monitor='val_acc', ...),
ModelCheckpoint(filepathLoss, monitor='val_loss', ...)]
model.fit(......., callbacks=callbacks)
Using custom callbacks
You can do anything you want in a LambdaCallback(on_epoch_end=saveModel)
.
best_val_acc = 0
best_val_loss = sys.float_info.max
def saveModel(epoch,logs):
val_acc = logs['val_acc']
val_loss = logs['val_loss']
if val_acc > best_val_acc:
best_val_acc = val_acc
model.save(...)
elif val_acc == best_val_acc:
if val_loss < best_val_loss:
best_val_loss=val_loss
model.save(...)
callbacks = [LambdaCallback(on_epoch_end=saveModel)]
But this is nothing different from a single ModelCheckpoint
with val_acc
. You won’t really be getting identical accuracies unless you’re using very few samples, or you have a custom accuracy that doesn’t vary much.
Answered By – Daniel Möller
This Answer collected from stackoverflow, is licensed under cc by-sa 2.5 , cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0